End of the Race to the Bottom? Stabilising Corporate Tax Rates and the New Global Tax Order

For more than two decades, finance ministers and tax directors have lived with an assumption:
corporate tax rates will keep trending down as jurisdictions compete for investment.

The latest OECD Corporate Tax Statistics 2025 suggest that moment has passed. Statutory corporate income tax (CIT) rates have stopped falling and are now broadly stable, even though they remain far below the levels seen in the early 2000s

For Caribbean and wider Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) businesses, this shift is more than a technical curiosity. It marks the beginning of a new global tax order in which:

• The “cheap” tax jurisdictions are fewer and more constrained.

• International rules limit how far profits can be shifted.

• Governments under fiscal pressure are increasingly defensive about their CIT base.

This article explores what the stabilisation of corporate tax rates means in practice – and how Caribbean groups should adapt their tax and investment strategies.

1. From sharp decline to “new normal”

The OECD data confirm a dramatic long-term fall in corporate tax rates:

• Across all Inclusive Framework jurisdictions, the average combined statutory corporate tax rate dropped from 28.0% in 2000 to 21.7% in 2019 

• Between 2000 and 2025, 114 jurisdictions cut their corporate tax rate, only 16 increased it and 15 left it unchanged .

Most of that decline took place in the 2000s and early 2010s. Since then, the picture has changed:

• From 2019 to 2025, the average combined rate has been almost flat, moving only from 21.7% to 21.2% 

• The OECD describes this as a “stabilisation” of corporate tax rates, with the downward trend effectively arrested.

In other words, the race to the bottom has slowed to a jog – and may be approaching the finish line.

Regional trends: LAC vs OECD and others

Regionally, the pattern is similar but with important nuances:

• In OECD countries, average statutory corporate rates fell from 32.3% in 2000 to 24.1% in 2025.

• In LAC, the average declined from 26.8% to 21.1% over the same period.

• In 2025, average rates were 26.7% in Africa, 21.1% in LAC, and 20.5% in Asia & Pacific.

When we exclude zero-rate jurisdictions, the overall average statutory rate for non-zero countries fell from 29.5% in 2000 to 23.0% in 2025, again with noticeable stabilisation in recent years .

For LAC specifically, this adjustment is critical:

• The simple average STR across all 35 LAC jurisdictions is 21.1%.

• But once you exclude the seven LAC jurisdictions with a zero rate, the average jumps to 26.4%, higher than the OECD average and close to the African average.

For Caribbean groups, this means that while the region may appear to be “mid-range” on headline rates, the countries that actually levy corporate tax often do so at relatively robust levels.

2. The new distribution: fewer extremes, more convergence

The OECD report also shows a clear reshaping of the distribution of statutory rates:

• Most of the movement between 2000 and 2025 has been towards rates between 10% and 30%.

• The number of jurisdictions in this band almost tripled from 40 to 105; those between 10% and 20% more than tripled from 9 to 32 .

• Only 26 out of 145 jurisdictions now have rates at or above 30% – with Colombia, Malta, and France at the high end (35%, 35% and 36.1% respectively).

At the bottom of the range:

• The number of jurisdictions with very low rates (<10%) has barely changed: 16 in 2000 vs. 14 in 2025.

• Eleven jurisdictions have no CIT or a rate of zero; three more – Barbados, Hungary and the United Arab Emirates – have positive rates below 10% (all 9%) .

However, the OECD notes that headline rates in these low-tax jurisdictions often do not reflect the full burden, either because of other local taxes (e.g. Hungary’s local business tax) or because previous preferential regimes already delivered very low effective tax rates before standard rates were cut.

The global picture is one of convergence:

• Fewer very high or very low statutory rates.

• A clustering of countries in the 20–30% range, particularly when zero-rate jurisdictions are excluded.

For investors, the implication is simple: choosing a jurisdiction purely on the basis of a low headline CIT rate is less viable than it once was.

3. Why the race slowed: three structural reasons

What has brought this “race to the bottom” to a near standstill? Several structural factors are at play.

3.1 Fiscal needs and political optics

Governments worldwide are under intense pressure to finance:

• Post-COVID recovery spending

• Climate transitions

• Ageing populations and social programmes

At the same time, many face political resistance to raising personal income tax or VAT. Corporate tax is therefore a natural target – both economically and politically.

Corporate taxpayers are expected to “pay their fair share”, and the optics of further rate cuts for companies in this context are challenging.

3.2 International coordination: BEPS and the minimum tax agenda

The OECD/G20 BEPS project has fundamentally reshaped the incentive structure:

• Harmful preferential regimes have been rolled back or amended to meet the BEPS Action 5 minimum standard 

• Hybrid mismatches, interest deductions, and CFC rules have tightened the ability of groups to shift profits to low-tax hubs.

With the emergence of Pillar Two and the concept of a 15% global minimum effective tax, the space for jurisdictions to differentiate themselves by very low rates has shrunk further. In practice, a country offering a sub-15% rate may simply forgo revenue that another jurisdiction will collect under top-up rules.

3.3 Transparency and reputational risk

Country-by-Country Reporting (CbCR) and broader data sharing have made profit shifting highly visible. The OECD notes that indicators of potential BEPS activity in investment hubs remain far higher than in other jurisdictions, even though some measures have eased slightly in recent years

For many governments, the reputational cost of being seen as a “tax haven” – and the risk of countermeasures – now outweigh the benefits of ultra-low rates. This further reduces the race-to-the-bottom pressure on mainstream jurisdictions.

4. What stabilising rates mean for Caribbean and LAC businesses

4.1 Less upside from “jurisdiction shopping”

In the old environment, multinational groups could generate substantial tax savings by:

• Locating IP and financing entities in very low-tax jurisdictions

• Deferring or avoiding taxation through preferential regimes and hybrid structures

Today, with statutory rates converging and effective minimum levels emerging, the marginal gain from this strategy is smaller – and the risk is higher.

For LAC and Caribbean businesses, this means that tax efficiency will increasingly come from good design within realistic rate environments, not from extreme rate arbitrage.

4.2 More focus on base, incentives and effective rates

As statutory rates stabilise, the real battleground shifts to:

• Corporate tax bases – depreciation rules, loss carryforwards, limitations on interest and other deductions.

• Targeted incentives – such as R&D tax credits, special economic zones, or green investment schemes.

• Effective Average and Marginal Tax Rates (EATR and EMTR) – forward-looking indicators that capture the combined effect of rate and base design.

The OECD’s data on effective rates show that EATRs have edged down slightly over the last decade but have also stabilised since around 2021, mirroring the pattern in statutory rates.

For boards, this means that headline CIT is no longer a sufficient guide; effective tax analytics are now essential in capital budgeting and location decisions.

4.3 Competitive positioning of Caribbean jurisdictions

The LAC region, excluding zero-rate jurisdictions, shows average statutory rates around 26.4%, higher than OECD members and close to African averages.

This raises strategic questions for Caribbean jurisdictions and investors:

• For host governments, how do you remain attractive to mobile capital while respecting global standards and maintaining revenue?

• For businesses, how do you structure investments to remain competitive given relatively high “true” rates in many positive-tax Caribbean countries?

The answer is unlikely to lie in rate cuts alone. Instead, it requires careful optimisation of regimes, incentives, and cross-border structures, all within the boundaries of BEPS and Pillar Two.

5. Strategic responses for boards and CFOs

Here are six practical responses Caribbean and regional groups should consider as they navigate this new tax order.

5.1 Re-anchor tax strategy on substance and value creation

With the era of easily available ultra-low tax hubs fading, the most sustainable approach is to:

• Align key profit-generating activities (decision-making, people, assets) with the jurisdictions where value is genuinely created.

• Document this alignment clearly in your transfer pricing and governance frameworks.

This reduces exposure to BEPS-related challenges and positions the group well for future international reforms.

5.2 Build effective tax models into investment decisions

Instead of relying on statutory rates or rule-of-thumb assumptions, boards should insist on:

• Project-specific EATR / EMTR calculations, incorporating local rules, incentives and withholding taxes.

• Scenario analysis that shows how effective tax outcomes change under different policy reforms or minimum tax regimes.

This provides a much more resilient basis for comparing investment locations and business models.

5.3 Review exposure to low-rate and zero-rate jurisdictions

Groups with significant substance-light entities in zero- or very low-rate jurisdictions should:

• Assess how these entities will be treated under Pillar Two and under local anti-avoidance rules.

• Consider consolidating or restructuring entities that are likely to attract sustained scrutiny or top-up tax.

• Evaluate whether value-adding activities can be migrated or better documented to support existing structures.

5.4 Optimise incentives – but stress-test them

R&D, innovation, and sector-specific incentives remain powerful tools. However:

• Incentives must be substance-backed (real people, real activity, real risk).

• Groups should regularly check that favoured regimes remain compliant with BEPS standards and are not at risk of being withdrawn or re-characterised as harmful.

A balanced strategy uses incentives to support genuine economic activity, not as the primary profit driver.

5.5 Strengthen tax governance and transparency

Revenue authorities, armed with more data and under pressure to protect CIT revenues, are becoming more assertive. Now is the time to:

• Put in place a board-approved tax strategy and risk appetite.

• Implement a tax risk framework that identifies, ranks and monitors key exposures (e.g. transfer pricing, withholding taxes, incentives, hybrid instruments).

• Ensure that reported tax information (CbCR, local files, public reporting) tells a consistent, defensible story about where and how you create value.

5.6 Use regional expertise to navigate overlapping regimes

Caribbean and LAC groups often operate across multiple jurisdictions with different:

• Rate structures and incentives

• Treaty networks and withholding tax profiles

• Domestic anti-avoidance frameworks

Coordinating these elements requires regional insight – understanding not only OECD rules but also local practice, enforcement culture and political trends.

6. How Dawgen Global can support your transition

Dawgen Global operates at the intersection of international standards and Caribbean reality. As the global race to the bottom in corporate tax rates slows, we help clients pivot towards a smarter, more resilient approach.

Our Tax Services team can support you with:

• Corporate tax strategy and governance aligned with your board’s risk appetite

• Effective tax rate modelling for investment decisions across the Caribbean and beyond

• Group structure and supply chain reviews in light of BEPS and Pillar Two

• Transfer pricing and cross-border planning, including withholding tax optimisation

• Incentive identification and implementation (R&D, innovation, green investments, SEZs)

• Audit defence and dispute resolution, grounded in strong documentation and substance

Next Step!

If your group is still relying on the old assumption that “rates will keep falling”, it’s time to recalibrate. The data show a new reality: corporate tax rates are stabilising, and the quality of your tax strategy now matters more than ever.

To explore what this means for your business – and to design a future-ready tax strategy tailored to your operations in the Caribbean and LAC region – connect with Dawgen Global’s Tax Services Team:

📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp (Global): +1 555 795 9071

At Dawgen Global, we help you make Smarter and More Effective Tax Decisions.

About Dawgen Global